Obama Seeks to Prove He is More Like Romney; Obama vs. Romney - What's the Difference?

Inquiring minds are reading Obama budget seeks to boost trade enforcement, ratchet pressure on ChinaPresident Barack Obama's new budget proposal will ask Congress to devote millions of dollars for a new trade enforcement center and more U.S. inspectors in China as the administration takes aim at unfair trade practices abroad, a senior administration official said Saturday.

It's all part of Obama's focus on boosting U.S. manufacturing and exports as he tries to win over voters and improve the economy in this election year. Romney talks tough on China

CNN reports Romney talks tough on ChinaCalling the country a "cheater," Romney promised to impose a variety of trade restrictions if China doesn't comply with intellectual property laws and allow its currency to float freely in foreign exchange markets.

"I'll clamp down on the cheaters, and China is the worst example of that," he said as he presented his top ideas for job creation in Las Vegas.

"If they cheat, there is a price to pay," he added. "I don't want a trade war, but I don't want a trade surrender either."Obama vs. Romney - What's the Difference?

If you like Obamacare, then vote for Romney or vote for Obama. It really does not matter. If you support war-mongering then vote for Obama or vote for Romney, it really does not matter. On Mideast policies,  it does not matter. On trade, it does not matter.

Other than a small number of social issues like abortion, it simply does not matter.

If you want a change, then vote for Ron Paul. Otherwise, let birth control and abortion be your guide because otherwise (as I have said repeatedly) President Obama and Mitt Romney are Nearly One and the Same!

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.


“Student Loan ‘Debt Bomb"; Obama's Misguided Proposal and Mish's Two-Point Alternative Proposal

It's interesting to watch some of the terms bandied about in headline news. For example, the LA Times headline reads S&P says student loan debt could be next financial bubble.

Next? Could Be?

What with the word "next"? Also what's with the words "could be"? Without a doubt student loans are in a bubble and have been for many years. The source of the problem, as it always is with financial bubbles, is cheap money, loans to nearly anyone, and in the case of student loans, no way to discharge the debt, even in bankruptcy.

From the article ...
"Student-loan debt has ballooned and may turn into a bubble," S&P said. "There are more defaults and downgrades for some student loan asset-backed securities."

Federal and private student-loan debt is approaching $1 trillion and surpassed credit-card debt for the first time in 2010, according to Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, a college grant and loan website. Under U.S. law, student-loan debt -- unlike credit-card borrowings -- can rarely be discharged in bankruptcy court.

President Barack Obama last month proposed linking federal aid to a college's ability to control tuition costs. The plan calls for increasing campus-based aid only for schools that limit tuition-cost increases and penalizing those that don't. The Next "Debt Bomb"

The Huffington Post says Student Loans Could Be America's Next "Debt Bomb"
Growing numbers of Americans are finding themselves bankrupt, with their college diplomas partially to blame.

Slightly more than 80 percent of bankruptcy attorneys say the number of their potential clients with student loan debt have increased "significantly" or "somewhat" in the past three to four years, according to a survey by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. And there's little hope those debtors will get out of their obligations; 95 percent of bankruptcy attorneys surveyed said that very few student loan debtors will be discharged from their loan as a result of undue hardship.

"Take it from those of us on the frontline of economic distress in America: This could very well be the next debt bomb for the U.S. economy," William E. Brewer, Jr., president of the NACBA said in a statement accompanying the survey.

With so many college graduates burdened with so much debt, the potential for bankruptcies is huge. Nearly 25 percent of bankruptcy attorneys said they've seen potential student loan client cases surge by 50 to more than 100 percent, according to the NACBA survey. That despite the number of Americans that filed for bankruptcy overall falling last year, according to The New York Times.

Americans that graduated college with loans in 2010 owe an average of about $25,000 -- a five percent boost from the year before, according to The Project on Student Debt. In addition, because they faced an unemployment rate of 9.1 percent upon graduation they're at a disadvantage when it comes to paying back the loans. 4 of 5 Bankruptcy Attorneys Report Major Jump in Student Loan Debtors Seeking Help

Inquiring minds may be interested in a link to Student Loan Survey taken by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA).

The NACBA survey of 860 bankruptcy attorneys nationwide found that:
  • More than four out of five bankruptcy attorneys (81 percent) say that potential clients with student loan debt have increased “significantly” or “somewhat” in the last three-four years. Overall, about half (48 percent) of bankruptcy attorneys reported significant increases in such potential clients.
  • Nearly two out of five of bankruptcy attorneys (39 percent) have seen potential student loan client cases jump 25-50 percent in the last three-four years. An additional quarter (23 percent) of bankruptcy attorneys have seen such cases jump by 50 percent to more than 100 percent.
  • Most bankruptcy attorneys (95 percent) report that few student loan debtors are seen as having any chance of obtaining a discharge as a result of undue hardship.

Titled “Student Loan ‘Debt Bomb’: America’s Next Mortgage-Style Economic Crisis,” the companion NACBA paper published today points out:

  • College seniors who graduated with student loans in 2010 owed an average of $25,250, up five percent from the previous year. Borrowing has grown far more quickly for those in the 35-49 age group, with school debt burden increasing by a staggering 47 percent.
  • Students are not alone in borrowing at record rates, so too are their parents. Loans to parents for the college education of children have jumped 75 percent since the 2005-2006 academic year. Parents have an average of $34,000 in student loans and that figure rises to about $50,000 over a standard 10-year loan repayment period. An estimated 17 percent of parents whose children graduated in 2010 took out loans, up from 5.6 percent in 1992-1993.
  • Of the Class of 2005 borrowers who began repayments the year they graduated, one analysis found 25 percent became delinquent at some point and 15 percent defaulted. The Chronicle of Education puts the default rate on government loans at 20 percent.

Obama's Misguided Plan to Fix the Problem

President Obama proposes to "fix" the problem by throwing more money at it. Instead, I propose the problem and solution is two-fold.

Two-Point Problem

  1. Guaranteed loans of any kind are a huge problem. An even bigger problem is guaranteed loans that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Schools have every incentive to drive up costs and to make loans to kids who simply do not belong in school at all,  as well as to kids whose benefit of education is far less than the cost of education.
  2. Lack of competition. We need more accredited universities that can offer online programs, at far cheaper prices.

Two-Point Solution

  1. Cancel the student loan program in entirety for new students and phase out student loans over the next three years for anyone already in such programs. 
  2.  Accrediting some online education programs say from India, would certainly go a long way towards massively increasing competition and reducing costs. Obviously some classes need to be hands-on type (lab work), but I am sure that can easily be arranged in conjunction with local colleges.

My proposal would get government out of the student loan business where it does not belong, while increasing free-market competition to dramatically drive down prices.

Obama's solution is to throw more money at the problem.

Recent Rise in Non-Revolving Loans

By the way, the recent reported rise in non-revolving loans was entirely due to a huge rise in student loans, further increasing the size of the problem.

Please take a look at Consumer Credit "Demolishes Expectations" Really? No Not Really! The "Non-Bounce" in Non-Revolving Credit for some very interesting graphs and comments on the rise in student loans.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.


Weekend Reading From Bespoke: Morning For Equities?

bespokeinvest.com - Sat, 2012-02-11 10:32

Each Friday, members of our Bespoke subscription services receive our Week in Review newsletter.  This report provides Bespoke's current market thoughts through commentary and the unique graphs and charts that our clients have come to love.  If you're looking to get a better grasp of the market, subscribe to one of our membership packages today and download our Week in Review newsletter.

In this week's newsletter:

  • 30 Days and counting without a 1% decline.
  • What Happened to all the volatility?
  • Are CDS markets confirming the rally?
  • An update of the Torture Indicator.
  • Sentiment - bullish or bearish.
  • Is this rally the real thing or another false start?
  • The juggernaut that is Apple (AAPL).
  • Economic Scorecard.
  • An update of Q4 earnings season.
  • 'Fixed Income' Equities.
  • Bull market breakouts.

Proceed to newsletter...  (Must be a Bespoke subscriber to view.)

Violent Protests in Greece; 6 Cabinet Members Resign; LAOS leader "I Would Rather Starve Than be Under German Jackboot"; Controversy Over Missing Paragraphs

Imagine you are asked to sign a document but three pages were missing. Further imagine the documents you were asked to sign were written in English but you only speak Greek. Would you sign?

That is exactly the predicament Greek officials were placed in by the Troika. Here is the story sent to me by Demetri Kofinas at Capital Account.
Hello Mish

George Karatzaferis leader of LOAS political party gave a speech today addressing why he refused to sign this latest agreement. In his speech, he said that he asked for a translated document of the agreement so that he could read it and sign it since his English is not as good as Papademos'.

When he got a copy, it was not only smaller than the English version, but was also missing pieces, including the last paragraph! He refused to sign it because he felt pressured and wants more time.

Youtube has a video of Karatzaferis where he compares the documents. At the 11:35 mark he translates the last paragraph for the listeners, which was not provided to him in the translated copy that he was to read.The video is in Greek so not many can understand it. Moreover, the video was somewhat garbled and some things do not easily translate, so I do not have a good account of the missing paragraphs, but it is clearly absurd that anything should be missing.

"I Would Rather Starve Than be Under German Jackboot"

Facing down protests, dissent, Greece vows to push through austerity warns of default 'chaos'Greece's future in the eurozone came under renewed threat Friday as popular protests again turned violent and dissent grew among its lawmakers after European leaders demanded deeper spending cuts.

The country's beleaguered coalition government promised to push through the tough new austerity measures and rescue a crucial euro130 billion ($170 billion) bailout deal after six members of the Cabinet resigned.

Prime Minister Lucas Papademos promised to "do everything necessary" to ensure parliament passes the new austerity measures that would slap Greeks with a minimum wage cut during a fifth year of recession. He also promised to replace any other Cabinet members who did not fully back his efforts.

Earlier Friday, the small right-wing LAOS party in Papademos' coalition said it would not back the new measures and four of its officials in the cabinet resigned, including the country's transport minister. Two Socialists cabinet members have also quit.

LAOS leader George Karatzaferis said rescue creditors had humiliated Greece.

"Of course we do not want to be outside the EU, but we can get by without being under the German jackboot," he said. "I would rather starve." 6 Cabinet Members Resign

Reuters reports Anger in Greece as parliament to vote on bailoutGreek lawmakers will vote this weekend on a controversial austerity bill that Athens needs to avoid a messy default but which is fuelling a domestic political and social crisis that has brought thousands of Greeks out on the streets in protest.

The cabinet approved the draft bill late on Friday - paving the way for a new multi-billion euro bailout and a debt-cut plan - after another day of rocky politics where six cabinet members resigned over the additional austerity demands.Violent Protests in Greece

Please consider Greek premier says default would lead to 'chaos'
Greece's future in the eurozone came under renewed threat Friday as popular protests again turned violent and dissent grew among its lawmakers after European leaders demanded deeper spending cuts.

In central Athens, clashes erupted outside Parliament between dozens of hooded youths and police in riot gear. Police said eight officers and two members of the public were injured, while six suspected rioters were arrested.

The violence broke as more than 15,000 people took to the streets of the capital after unions launched a two-day general strike that disrupted transport and other public services and left state hospitals running on emergency staff.

Scores of youths, some in gas masks, used sledge hammers to smash up marble paving stones in Athens' main Syntagma Square before hurling the rubble at riot police.Note the irony of that last headline. It should be perfectly clear Greece is already in a state of dysfunctional chaos. That said, things can always get worse, and they will.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.


Gold & Silver Investors and Traders.

TheDailyGold - Fri, 2012-02-10 18:04

The Dollar Confirms a Possible Silver Pullback

Based on the February 10th, 2012 Premium Update. Visit our archives for more gold & silver analysis.

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom (for those who invest in gold) , it was the age of (central bank) foolishness, it was the epoch of belief (in Chinese growth) , it was the epoch of incredulity (in fiat money), it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the (Arab) spring of hope, it was the winter of (Syrian) despair.”


With several of our own additions in parenthesis, these are the opening lines of the famous novel “A Tale of Two Cities,” by Charles Dickens whose 200th year birthday was celebrated around the world this week. His words seem just as true and relevant today as in the time in which they were written.


Greece played the Artful Dodger this week and missed another deadline to approve conditions for a second €130bn bail-out on Tuesday night because of last-minute haggling with international lenders over emergency spending cuts. Negotiations to save Greece from a disorderly default are now teetering on the edge.


The delay fueled anxieties that Athens may be forced into a messy default next month and triggered concern over whether Greece remains committed to fiscal reform after two years of failing to implement measures agreed in return for financial support. Greece has already missed two deadlines this week. Finally a deal was  presented for approval at a meeting of eurozone finance ministers Wednesday only to be sent back to Greece as incomplete with a fresh set of demands and an urgent deadline. The eurozone finance ministers dismissed as incomplete a reputed €3.3bn package of Greek budget cuts and sent the country’s finance minister back to Athens with a fresh set of demands and an urgent deadline. They also warned of more intensive involvement in the Greek economy to improve tax collection and accelerate the sale of state-owned assets.


Earlier in the week the Great Expectations that a Greek rescue plan will be completed drove the dollar down sharply against the euro and boosted gold 1.5 per cent on Tuesday.


Gold could face a short-term pullback if Greece strikes a deal, as it may hurt the appeal of safe-haven assets, but on the other hand it will be good for the euro (bearish for USD Index), which might be bullish for gold. In the long run, the lingering euro zone debt crisis is expected to support sentiment in gold.


Charles Dickens said: “Do all the good you can and make as little fuss about it as possible.” To see what good we can do for precious metals investors, let’s begin the technical part with the analysis of the USD Index. We will start with the very long-term chart (charts courtesy by http://stockcharts.com.)

In the very long-term USD Index chart we see no significant changes. Thursday’s closing index level is slightly below that of a week ago, but the recent move back below the long-term resistance line has not yet been confirmed. The index level is now more or less right at this support-resistance line, and the medium/long-term situation is slightly more bearish than not.

In the short-term USD Index chart, we see that the index “somewhat bottomed” at the cyclical turning point. Instead of a rally, a pause has followed with some sideways trading and small moves to the downside although declining at a much slower pace than seen in previous weeks. It seems likely that the index could actually rally in the very short term but the outlook for the medium term is bearish.


The situation for the USD Index appears rather bearish for the medium term but bullish for the short term, which might be a bearish short-term indication for the precious metals sector. It is also consistent with our recent view on the mining stocks part of the precious metals sector published on February 3rd, 2012 in our essay on the likely top in mining stocks:


(…) the medium- and long-term outlook for the gold and silver mining stocks is positive, however a correction is likely to be seen soon – perhaps it will start next week. Long-term investors should consider purchasing junior mining stocks, while short-term traders might want to trade the coming correction.(…) if you’ve been considering trying out our Premium Service, it appears to be a good idea to do so now.


Since the dollar is negatively correlated with the precious metals market, the likelihood of a rally is bearish factor for the precious metals sector – also for silver.

A look at the very long-term chart (if you’re reading this essay at www.sunshineprofits.com, you may click on the above chart to enlarge it) reveals a rather uneventful week. Silver’s price has been in a sideways trading pattern during the past two weeks after a strong rally in which the red support-resistance line was pierced and volume levels were significant. With silver now above this line, it seems that a move back to it, a test of the breakout may in fact be seen. The 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level based on the 2002 to 2011 rally is also in play and will likely assist in stopping a decline as well.


Summing up, the medium and long-term outlook for silver remains bullish but – also based on the analysis of the USD Index – the short term is now more bearish than not.


To make sure that you are notified once the new features are implemented, and get immediate access to my free thoughts on the market, including information not available publicly, we urge you to sign up for our free e-mail list. Gold & Silver Investors should definitely join us today and additionally get free, 7-day access to the Premium Sections on our website, including valuable tools and unique charts. It’s free and you may unsubscribe at any time.

Thank you for reading. Have a great weekend and profitable week!

P. Radomski
Editor
www.SunshineProfits.com

* * * * *


Interested in increasing your profits in the PM sector? Want to know which stocks to buy? Would you like to improve your risk/reward ratio?

Sunshine Profits provides professional support for

Apart from weekly Premium Updates and quick Market Alerts, members of the Sunshine Profits’ Premium Service gain access to Gold Charts, Gold Investment Tools and Analysis of Gold & Silver Prices Naturally, you may browse the sample version and easily sign-up for a free weekly trial to see if the Premium Service meets your expectations.

All essays, research and information found above represent analyses and opinions of Mr. Radomski and Sunshine Profits’ associates only. As such, it may prove wrong and be a subject to change without notice. Opinions and analyses were based on data available to authors of respective essays at the time of writing. Although the information provided above is based on careful research and sources that are believed to be accurate, Mr. Radomski and his associates do not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the data or information reported. The opinions published above belong to Mr. Radomski or respective associates and are neither an offer nor a recommendation to purchase or sell securities. Mr. Radomski is not a Registered Securities Advisor. Mr. Radomski does not recommend services, products, business or investment in any company mentioned in any of his essays or reports. Materials published above have been prepared for your private use and their sole purpose is to educate readers about various investments.

By reading Mr. Radomski’s essays or reports you fully agree that he will not be held responsible or liable for any decisions you make regarding any information provided in these essays or reports. Investing, trading and speculation in any financial markets may involve high risk of loss. We strongly advise that you consult a certified investment advisor and we encourage you to do your own research before making any investment decision. Mr. Radomski, Sunshine Profits’ employees and affiliates as well as members of their families may have a short or long position in any securities, including those mentioned in any of the reports or essays, and may make additional purchases and/or sales of those securities without notice.


Gold Down on Week Following Rejection of “Weak” Greek Reforms, Draghi Denies “Stigma” of ECB Lending

TheDailyGold - Fri, 2012-02-10 17:06


Friday 10 February 2012, 09:00 EST

Gold Down on Week Following Rejection of “Weak” Greek Reforms, Draghi Denies “Stigma” of ECB Lending

U.S. DOLLAR gold prices were on course for a second weekly fall Friday lunchtime in London, heading down towards $1700 an ounce following European ministers’ rejection yesterday of Greece’s latest austerity reforms.

Silver prices also traded lower, hitting $33.27 per ounce – 1.4% down on last week’s close.
Stocks, commodities and the Euro all fell, while the Dollar gained along with prices for major nation government bonds.

“Gains in the US Dollar and consistent disappointment from the European Union regarding the Greece debt deal are curbing any gains in gold,” reckons Pradeep Unni, senior analyst at commodity brokerage Richcomm Global Services in Dubai.

“People are just throwing in the towel because we didn’t see a rally,” adds Afshin Nabavi, senior vice president at Swiss precious metals refiner MKS.

Spot market gold prices were down 1.2% for the week Friday lunchtime, hitting $1706 per ounce, their lowest level since Jan.25, the day the US Federal Reserve confirmed its policymakers expect near-zero interest rates until at least late 2014.

Eurozone finance ministers yesterday dismissed a reported €3.3 billion package of spending cuts presented to them by Greece’s leaders, who have now been asked to find an additional €325 million in savings.

“No disbursement before implementation,” said Luxembourg prime minister Jean-Claude Juncker, who chairs the Eurogroup of single currency finance ministers.

“We can’t live with this system where promises are repeated and repeated and repeated and implementation measures are sometimes too weak.”

The Eurogroup also suggested that there could be greater external involvement in the Greek economy, with the aim of improving tax collection and speeding up privatization of state assets. German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble meantime said the ministers “will certainly not discuss a top-up” of Greece’s €130 billion second bailout.

“If we see the salvation and future of the country in the Euro area,” said Greek finance minister Evangelos Venizelos, “[then] we have to do whatever we have to do to get the program approved.”
“Venizelos, like some officials before him, is playing the ‘in or out’ card,” says this morning’s note from Standard Bank currency analysts Steve Barrow and Jeremy Stevens.

“We suspect [the Eurogroup's conditions] will be delivered, but not without some acrimony.”
Thousands took to the streets in Athens Friday as unions called a two-day protest strike, the second this week following Tuesday’s 24 hour action.

“With Greek elections planned for April 2012, it may be the case that the politicians who sign off on agreements to receive Euroland aid next week may be replaced quite swiftly by less amenable types,” notes one gold bullion dealer here in London.

If the second bailout is not approved, Greece will be unable to pay over €14 billion of debt that matures on March 20.

“[Greek politicians] must get this deal agreed really within the next few days to enable them sufficient time and have the new bailout money disbursed before that bond is due,” says Tony Stringer, managing director of global sovereigns at ratings agency Fitch.

“If they don’t manage to achieve that, then it could be in the realm of a disorderly default.”

European Central Bank president Mario Draghi meantime denied a suggestion put to him at Thursday’s  press conference that the ECB’s three year longer term refinancing operation – at which European banks can borrow from the central bank at low rates – represents “hidden government financing” that some banks would prefer not to access.

Deutsche Bank chief executive Josef Ackermann said last week that: “the fact that we have never taken any money from the government has made us, from a reputation point of view, so attractive with so many clients in the world that we would be very reluctant to give that up.”

“There is no stigma whatsoever attached to these facilities,” said Draghi yesterday, adding that some bankers’ statements were “statements of virility” and that many banks whose chiefs have made such comments have actually accessed the LTRO or other ECB credit facilities.

The ECB also announced Thursday that it is changing the rules on collateral banks can post against their ECB borrowing to widen eligibility, although the Governing Council decision was not unanimous.

Regulated commodity futures exchange CME has lowered its margin on gold futures trades, along with margins on silver and copper.

“The announcement…has failed to inspire much interest [in gold]” says Marc Ground, commodities strategist at Standard Bank.

CME raised its margin on gold trading in both August and September last year, “contributing to the sharp fall” in gold prices seen over those weeks, according to a note from Commerzbank this morning.

Ben Traynor
BullionVault

Gold value calculator   |   Buy gold online at live prices

Editor of Gold News, the analysis and investment research site from world-leading gold ownership service BullionVault, Ben Traynor was formerly editor of the Fleet Street Letter, the UK’s longest-running investment letter. A Cambridge economics graduate, he is a professional writer and editor with a specialist interest in monetary economics.

(c) BullionVault 2011

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.


Profit From Volatility In Gold and Silver Prices

TheDailyGold - Fri, 2012-02-10 17:01

Gold’s (GLD) accelerated move to $1900 in the summer of 2011 past overhead resistance indicated the market was waiting for an inflationary QE3.  The market got a surprise as Bernanke waited until 2012.  This was no surprise for my readers and precious metals declined lower in the second half depicting a surprise move with gaps lower.
We were able to call the top in silver (SLV) in April 2011 and gold in September 2011 as it reached overbought conditions, locking in partial profits.  On April 28, 2011 I wrote, “Remember that I am recommending partial profits if your winnings enable you to play with the house’s money and you are still holding silver from our August  2010 Buy Signal at $18. Other readers who have not been able to build a position can wait for the inevitable pullback as additional buying opportunities.”  A few days later in May we saw a volatile decline in silver of close to 40%.
Likewise in August of 2011, I became concerned of a correction in gold as it reached overbought territory.  On August 5, 2011 I wrote, “Although the technical picture for precious metals is improving, there will be periods of volatility as the global markets shake. A consolidation in gold would be normal and healthy.”  A few weeks later gold topped and corrected for the rest of 2011.
Mining equities (GDX) and precious metals sold off hard in the third and fourth quarter of 2011. When such unexpected short term pullbacks occur we must monitor the rebound.  Negative news which causes a temporary decline with a powerful recovery indicates strength and resilience.
The precious metals and natural resource market appears to be finding its footing and now may return to close some of those downside gaps in 2012 .  The recent selling panic in gold and silver bullion has abated and reversals are beginning to occur.  We are on the verge of a breakout at $35 in silver, $4 copper (JJC) and $1800 gold could be significant.  Junior mining stocks (GDXJ) are also making dramatic moves higher especially in the uranium (URA) and rare earths (REMX).
One should never get caught up with a selling panic like the end of 2011 especially in gold and silver bullion which has had significant up moves over the past 18 months and past ten decades.  Recently gold’s accelerated move to $1900 and silver’s to $50 was overdue for a restorative, healthy pullback.
It must be emphasized acting in a knee jerk fashion following the herd and panic by selling at discounted levels for pennies on the dollar must be avoided.  Some analysts were caught up with the decline irrationally calling the end to a 10 year bull trend.  How foolish!
Gold and silver are finding support and the end of 2011 was not a time to call the end of a trend, but to realize that gold and silver was providing a discounted buying opportunity.   The mining shares have never been so oversold in this entire decade long run as it was in the end of 2011.  The recent volatile selloff created an extreme oversold condition where reversals occur.  Although the recent rise has been on volume, a break above the 200 day  on increased volume for the miners and silver could indicate that the downside gaps made in 2011 may be closed sooner rather than later and potentially very quickly.
Gold Stock Trades has weathered several corrections in miners, gold and silver over the past 10 years and each time we have maintained a strong hand.
It is normal and necessary to have corrections.  Quality mining equities and precious metals begin new bases and reach compelling valuations that long term, contrarian investors can use to their benefit by adding to positions or initiating purchases in favorite stocks or sectors which one has not participated in yet.
One must not be discouraged or give up during volatile selloffs like 2008 or 2010 or 2011 and run to cash.  One must use short term volatility to one’s advantage and go against the latest fad.  We buy winter coats in the summer.
We must stay focussed on the long term trends and realize that the mining stocks have been beaten down in 2011 to dramatically oversold levels.  It is time to pick up resource stocks especially in uranium, rare earths and gold/silver explorers (SIL) selling at great discounts.
Despite recent carnage silver and the industrial metals are exhibiting relative strength to gold in 2012.  The long term trend for silver is intact and it appears to have found support at its long term trend around $30.  The momentum indicators have bounced off oversold levels.  Silver has all the right criteria for a fast move to test all time highs.
It is no surprise why the uptrend in commodities is intact.  The West is monetizing debt and printing dollars at a record pace to alleviate the debt crisis.  Risk on has been the name of the game in 2012.
Those on the sidelines in cash (UUP) and treasuries(TLT), playing risk off are in fact playing a very risky game as inflation appears to be the flavor of the day.
Look for technical breakouts in gold, silver, copper, uranium and rare earths as they all appear to be reversing higher as the moving averages transition upward.  Don’t be unsettled by short term pullbacks or day to day volatility.  Use pullbacks as opportunities on this long term upward trend in gold and silver.  The risk off trade in Treasuries and the U.S. dollar appears to be losing momentum and dangerously teetering on a decline.  Pay attention to the ball not the windup as we may be witnessing a trend change.   To get scouting reports, specific targets and up to the minute updates on the natural resource market click here.  


Which Way Market?

bespokeinvest.com - Fri, 2012-02-10 14:41

The S&P 500 has gotten off to one of its best starts to a year in decades, but which way is it headed now?  Are we due for a longer-term pullback or can the index continue higher and break its April 2011 bull market highs?  Let us know by taking part in the poll below, which asks whether the S&P 500 will be higher or lower from current levels at the end of the first quarter (March 31st).  This should give us a pretty good idea of where sentiment currently stands among investors and traders.  We'll report back with the results shortly.

Will the S&P 500 be higher or lower by the end of the first quarter?HigherLower  Free polls from Pollhost.com

Subscribe to Bespoke Premium and gain access to our top market ideas.

Earnings Season Gets Better

bespokeinvest.com - Fri, 2012-02-10 14:23

Two weeks ago at this time, just 57% of the companies that had reported this earnings season had beaten earnings estimates.  As shown below, 61.5% of companies that have reported have now beaten estimates.  This is just below the historical average of 62% going back to 1998. 

While they're still negative, guidance numbers have also gotten slightly better recently.  Below is a chart showing the spread between the percentage of companies that have raised guidance minus the percentage that have lowered guidance on a quarterly basis going back to 2003.  As shown, this earnings season, the spread is -3.3 percentage points, meaning more companies have lowered than raised.  This is the most negative reading since the first quarter of 2009.  Last week at this time, the spread was at -4.2%, however, so guidance did get better this week.

Regardless of what companies have reported, as a whole, they have performed well on their report days this season.  As shown below, the average stock that has reported this season has gained 0.44% on its report day.  This is the second consecutive earnings season and the fourth out of the last five where stocks have averaged gains on their report days.

Subscribe to Bespoke Premium and gain access to our complete earnings season analysis.

 

Top Earnings Season Triple Plays

bespokeinvest.com - Fri, 2012-02-10 13:41

So far this earnings season, just 3.9% of the companies that have reported have reported triple plays.  These are stocks that beat both their earnings and revenue estimates and also raised guidance. 

We consider triple play stocks the cream of the crop of earnings season, and all of the stocks are worth looking into more once they have reported such strong numbers.  We analyzed the price charts of the 49 triple plays so far this earnings season and found the ones that we believe currently look the most attractive from a technical perspective as well.

Below are the twelve stocks that we believe have the best chance of rallying from now until their next earnings reports based on their chart patterns.  On the following pages we provide charts and descriptions for each of the twelve stocks listed, and on the final page of this report, we provide a list of all 49 triple plays.

Continue to report...  (Must be a Bespoke Premium member to view.)

Petroleum 3-Month Rolling Average Turns Sharply Lower; Negative Shipping Rates; Collapse in Global Trade

On February 6, I noted (with huge thanks to reader Tim Wallace) a Huge Plunge In Petroleum and Gasoline Usage.

Tim used weekly numbers, which show, much week-to-week volatility. Instead, I proposed using rolling three-month averages, compared to the same three months in prior years.

Today I received some updated charts that are much easier to see precisely what is happening.

Gasoline Usage Last Three Months vs. Last Three Months Prior Years



click on any chart for sharper image

Gasoline Usage by Quarter Ending December 2011



Petroleum Usage by Quarter Ending December 2011



Wallace writes "Gasoline and petroleum demand recently has plunged more than at any time in the recession. When you see petroleum usage back to numbers in the 1990's, you know there is serious economic trouble no matter what the talking heads say."

Wallace willing, each month I will post the "Petroleum Rolling Three-Month Average Index". Hopefully we can get a derivative of that first chart, "Percent Change From a Year Ago".

At the end of February the comparison will be December - January - February vs. the same three months in prior years.

Negative Shipping Rents

Amazingly, shipping rates have dropped so low, shippers will pay you to ship, just to get the cargo vessels to better locations.

Bloomberg reports Charter Rates Go Negative
Glencore International Plc paid nothing to hire a dry-bulk ship with the vessel’s operator paying $2,000 a day of the trader’s fuel costs after freight rates plunged to all-time lows.

The vessel will haul a cargo of grains to Europe, putting the carrier in a better position for its next shipment, he said.

“Our other option was to stay in the Pacific and earn poor revenues or ballast to the Atlantic and pay the fuel ourselves,” Rodley said. Ballasting refers to sailing without a cargo. Charles Watenphul, a spokesman for Glencore, declined to comment in an e-mailed response to questions.

Charters for the so-called backhaul routes that reposition ships to the Atlantic Ocean region from the Pacific are falling to the lowest since indexes started, exchange data show. Rents for Capesize ships that haul ore and grain on backhaul routes were at minus $7,342 a day, the lowest since that index began in 1999, exchange data show.

D/S Norden A/S, Europe’s biggest publicly trading commodity shipping company, said Feb. 3 it hired a Supramax vessel at no cost other than fuel charges, its first such transaction in a quarter century.Baltic Dry Index - $BDI



The Baltic Dry shipping index (a measure of shipping costs) was down 32 days in a row before turning up on Tuesday.

The Harper-Peterson Shipping Index is also in dismal shape.



Many ships came online in the last couple years but a plunge this deep cannot be blamed entirely on new ships added.

Rather, the huge dropoff in gasoline and petroleum usage in the US, coupled with falling shipping rates, a drop in Japanese Exports Three Consecutive Months, and a European Recession poised to get much worse, makes a strong case that a collapse in global trade is underway.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.


Selling the Winners

bespokeinvest.com - Fri, 2012-02-10 12:40

We ran our decile analysis on the S&P 500 to see how the stocks that had been up the most and least so far this year are performing today with the index down close to 1%.  To run the analysis, we break the index into deciles (10 groups of 50 stocks each) based on YTD performance through yesterday's close, and then we calculate the average change today for the stocks in each decile.

As shown below, the 50 best performing S&P 500 stocks YTD heading into today are down an average of 1.41%, while the 50 stocks that were up the least YTD are down 0.72% today.  While the spread in performance across the deciles isn't that wide, traders are clearly taking some profits in this year's winners today, which have mostly been highly cyclical stocks.

 

Subscribe to Bespoke Premium and gain access to our top market ideas. 

How Bull Markets Evolve into Bubbles

TheDailyGold - Fri, 2012-02-10 05:01

There is a science to market movements and various trends because human nature is consistent over time. Bear markets follow a pattern as do bull markets. In recent weeks we’ve noted the similarities between the past four equity bull markets. They start off strong for six or seven years before slowing down over the next five years. Then they break to new highs and eventually accelerate into a bubble. As we show in this update, change in valuation explains how bull markets evolve into bubbles.

The following chart shows the Nikkei (black) and its price to earnings ratio (blue). The chart comes from DailyWealth but the annotations are mine. In our opinion, the Japanese bull market began in the late 1960s. Note, from 1977-1983 the PE ratio trended down slightly, yet the market continued to rise. In other words, profits increased faster than the market (share prices). In 1983 the PE ratio broke to a new high and would move from 20 to over 70 in about five years.

Next is a chart of the Nasdaq’s price to earnings ratio, courtesy of InvestTech Research. The ratio declined from 1991-1995. It wasn’t until the end of 1996 that the ratio began to move to new highs. We cut off part of the chart as it was too tall due to the fact that the PE ratio eventually reached 260!

Where do the gold equities stand? This chart from the Erste Group, shows the PE ratio for the HUI Gold Bugs Index. This chart was produced in July 2011. Since then the HUI has declined slightly. The estimated PE for 2011 (less than 15) is close to reality. We do expect 2011 to be the bottom for the PE ratio. According to Yahoo Finance, the trailing PE ratio for GDX (large cap gold stocks ETF) is 10. After hitting a low, it took less than three years for the PE ratio for the Nasdaq and Nikkei to move to new highs.

Bull markets follow three stages. These are the initial stealth phase, the wall of worry phase and then the bubble or public participation phase. By now you should know we are in the wall of worry phase. The current valuation of gold stocks confirms that. Sentiment confirms that. After all, gold stocks have made little net progress in the last four years while Gold has nearly doubled in the same period. The mainstream continues to ignore the gold equities while most of the true supporters are doubting the future.

Yet this wall of worry phase is what sets the stage for the bubble phase. In this period, earnings increase faster than stock prices and it results in lower valuations and improved fundamentals. At the same time, sentiment from a contrary perspective becomes more compelling. Many investors bail out of the bull market in this period leaving the strong hands in control of a bull market that remains intact.

Remember, stock prices are a function of earnings and valuations. In the first phase of a bubble we see earnings rise and valuations move from a low to a high. In the second phase of a bubble, skyrocketing valuations are the primary driver of share price appreciation. Bubbles develop from a one-two punch of rising profits and rising valuations. Over the next several years, the PE for the gold stocks (currently 10) could easily move back to 2004-2005 levels. Combined with continued increases in profits, share prices would explode. If you’d like help in stock selection and navigating this bull market then we invite you to learn more about our premium service.

Good Luck!

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT
Jordan@TheDailyGold.com


The Problems in Housing and the Labor Markets Will Not Go Away Soon

maseportfolio.blogspot - Fri, 2012-02-10 03:19

President Obama announced a mortgage plan aimed at giving relief to homeowners that are facing problems with their mortgages.  Yet, this is just putting a finger in a hole in the dike.
The problem is that after fifty years of governmental credit inflation many homeowners are facing the reality that their homes were grossly over-valued and that they assumed too much debt to finance their “American Dream.”
One out of every four or five houses has a mortgage on the property that is greater than the market value of the house.  Many of these homes are now valued at only 75 percent or less of their mortgage value. 
Regardless of a government “solution” to this situation, either through debt relief or a renewed bout of government-induced inflation, the attitudes and expectations of homeowners have changed.  These homeowners have been “burned” and are unlikely to expose themselves to this possibility again in their lifetimes. 
Even if the market stabilizes in the near term and housing prices bottom out, many potential home buyers will be much more financially conservative in the future given the experience that they have just been gone through. 
The reluctance to buy a home will also be affected by the situation in the labor market.   And, here again there is a longer-term problem that will not be resolved in a matter of months. 
One out of every four or five people of employment age are either unemployed, employed in a part time job but would like to be employed full time, or are not seeking employment.  The percentage of working age people in the labor market has recently dropped to a level not seen for several decades. 
With conditions in the labor market so tenuous, people will not have the same resources to purchase housing as they have had in the recent past. 
But, how is this under-employment situation in the labor market going to be resolved in the short-run?
The fundamentalist preacher Paul Krugman cries out for short-run government “solutions” to put people back into the jobs that were in existence at another time.  Krugman writes, “We have become a society in which less-educated men have great difficulty finding jobs with decent wages and good benefits.”  For example, “Adjusted for inflation, entry-level wages of male high school graduates have fallen 23 percent since 1973.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/opinion/krugman-money-and-morals.html?ref=opinion)
Maybe, part of this problem is that the government has emphasized putting high school graduates into what have historically been entry-level jobs, jobs that are shrinking as a proportion of the jobs available due to changes in technology and needed training.  And, what about those that do not graduate from high school…they are in an even less-favorable position. 
Elsewhere in the New York Times, we read that “Rich and Poor Further Apart in Education.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/education/education-gap-grows-between-rich-and-poor-studies-show.html?hp) “Education was historically considered a great equalizer in American society, capable of lifting less advantaged children and improving their chances for success as adults.  But a body of recently published scholarship suggests that the achievement gap between rich and poor children is widening, a development that threatens to dilute education’s leveling effects.”
This is a gap that cannot be overcome quickly.  And, it is a gap that cannot be overcome by national tests and government spending.    Since the end of World War II, politicians have generally believed that they could get elected and re-elected by keeping people employed and by helping more and more people become homeowners.  This underlying emphasis has resulted in the fifty years of credit inflation the United States has experienced since the early 1960s. 
People were kept employed by short-term government economic programs that put the unemployed back into the jobs that held previously before becoming unemployed.  And, why should someone going through high school be concerned about employment when they knew that the government would continue to stimulate jobs in heavy manufacturing and industry and keep them employed. 
The government continued to promote these kinds of stimulus programs even though under-employment increased steadily over the past fifty years and the capacity utilization in manufacturing was declining over the same time period. 
The federal homeowner programs and credit inflation created in the housing sector over the same time period created a “piggy bank” for many people not only helping them to own their own home, but also to allow them the ability to borrow more and more money to binge on consumer goods.     
So, we ended up with the “less wealthy” being under-educated and hence not readily employable in the labor markets of the 21st century and with many of these same people owning homes and over-their-heads in debt.     This is a situation that does not have an easy or ready solution. 
Under-employment can only be resolved over an extended period of time.  The same holds for people with too much debt.  Short-run stimulus is not the answer.  In fact, the emphasis on short-run stimulation has created and further exacerbated the situation. 
A safety net may be necessary for many of the under-employed and overly leveraged.  In fact, the efforts to keep people in “legacy” jobs and to put families in homes to make their life better may have resulted in a whole generation of individuals being excluded from the mainstream.  They are going to need some economic support.
But, the only real solution to the labor market situation is a long run one and it begins with education and the environment that surrounds the culture of education. 
The situation in the housing market will only get better as people lower their expectations and get their balance sheets back in order.  This, too, will take a substantial amount of time because it is related to a major change in expectations.  People, in the future, just cannot expect a “free ride.”      

Abandoning The Dollar For Gold

TheDailyGold - Fri, 2012-02-10 02:56

Jan Skoyles looks at the recent stories of countries abandoning the dollar for gold in international transactions. This will have implications for the gold price, but will it have an impact on further debates involving the gold standard. At The Real Asset Co we promote a return to sound money and so developments such as those discussed below always grab our attention.

Last month the papers were full of reports stating Iran had agreed to sell their oil to India in exchange for gold. The agreement to trade in gold sidesteps the sanctions issued by the EU and US law which prohibit all new oil contracts and have frozen the Iranian central bank’s assets in the EU. Soon after the India/Iran story there were reports of both Russia and China making similar deals with the Iranians. This isn’t the first time international payment agreements have been rumoured to be taking place. In 2009, there were reports of the Arab states, along with Russia, China, Japan and strangely, France, to start trading oil using a new basket of currencies. This basket was rumoured to include the Japanese yen and Chinese Yuan, the euro, a new,  single currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council and of course, gold.
Nothing has come to light in any of these instances. But such rumours do impact upon both the gold price and further discussions of a return to some form of the gold standard. Gold tactics These sanctions on Iran are also not new ‘nor is the use of gold as a response to certain actions. Back in late 1979, Iranian student Revolutionary Guards stormed the US Embassy, in Tehran, taking several US Hostages. The Americans responded by freezing Iran’s gold which was held in Fort Knox. The Iranians responded by panic buying gold from Zurich. The freezing of gold assets by the US Federal Reserve made other countries realise their gold was no longer safe, sparking a gold buying spree by the Middle East. This was enough to push the gold price above $850. This act of lawlessness by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards was of course wrong – in the same way starting a nuclear war would be wrong. However the actions by the US government in 1979 was also wrong, as it is today for both the US and the EU to implement sanctions. They may, possibly, prevent a nuclear war, but an economic war seems likely.
This reoccurring issue of abandoning the US dollar, in order to push a political motive, for another national currency, a basket of currencies or even gold raises the question of whether it is ever a sensible idea to have one national currency as the international reserve currency. Bad money Canadian economist Robert Mundell argues no national currency should ever be used as a leading reserve currency. He argues precious metals were used as international money over the centuries ‘because they were more efficient than other instruments in fulfilling the required functions of money.’ Mundell goes onto argue that currencies which are controlled at the whim of a government tend to weaken over the long term as supply begins to outweigh demand.
For Mundell, currencies in which there are opportunities to exploit and overvalue due to the monopoly of government, is ‘bad’ money. This has been no more the case than with the United States and the dollar.  It now seems countries which are growing rapidly and have significant trading weight, are rapidly losing confidence in the US dollar and beginning to realise there is an alternative. Paul Fabra states that whichever country’s fiat money you use, it will be dangerous; ‘in a world where real money is replaced by fiat money and monetary reserves increasingly consist of other countries’ fiat money, the monetary system resembles a house of cards.’ To have power of a monetary system is to remove democratic rights from those participating in that monetary system. This applies to both citizens of the currency and those who trade with them. Gold money is danger money For those who abandon the US Dollar in the oil trade, the future does not look bright. In 2003 a Middle Eastern oil producing nation abandoned the dollar in favour of the Euro. A few months after their president joyously announced his decision the Brits and American invaded, toppling Saddam Hussein from power. It was not long after this Iran, in 2009, also announced their foreign currency reserves would also be kept in euros, rather than US dollars. Is this how wars begin? Is it in fact not about human rights or oil but is in fact about whose currencies are the toughest? There are reportedly other factors at work here, which are apparently the cause of these currency wars – namely the nuclear threat from Iran. But it is worth discussing the undemocratic nature of using a country’s currency as an international currency. Jan Skoyles looks at the recent stories of countries abandoning the dollar for gold in international transactions. This will have implications for the gold price, but will it have an impact on further debates involving the gold standard. The Libertarian Dr Tim Baker once said to me, he doesn’t know which currency is the right one but whatever currency is chosen by thepeople is the correct one. This was no more the case than is seen in the period of the Classical Gold Standard. The Classical Gold Standard is the most famous commodity standard in history. The decision to move onto the gold standard around the late 1870s was not the result of an international treaty or summit as we so often see on the news. There were no group photos taken of our great leaders announcing they had decided on this brand new way to trade. No, it happened gradually and by choice. Great Britain, at the time was the great economic and political power, and had operated on a gold standard ever since 1717. By 1880 Great Britain’s trading partners had realised that due to the influence and power of the Commonwealth, it would be advantageous to move from their own metallic standards to what is now known as the Classical Gold Standard.
We then saw the US take advantage of its position as the wealthiest, least scathed country to come out of both World Wars. This was its opportunity to exert its power over the global financial system. Through several stages, the Americans removed gold completely from the international monetary system. Now, with their trillion dollars of debt and more supply to meet demand – the house of cards that is dominated by the joker US dollar is beginning to wobble. Jan Skoyles looks at the recent stories of countries abandoning the dollar for gold in international transactions. This will have implications for the gold price, but will it have an impact on further debates involving the gold standard. As we alluded to in a recent article, the Chinese economy has astonished us all with their economic performance since the 1970s. The majority of the measures which useless economic groups such as the WEF use to assess countries, are met by the Chinese. The Chinese are hoarding gold, they’re rumoured to be partaking in gold payments with Iran. Are we beginning to see the next stage of a global currency change? These countries, Iran, India, China and Russia have a lot of what we want – oil and manufactured goods. It is also worth noting, Venezuela has, in the last week, received the last of its $11bn worth of repatriated gold. The head of Venezuela’s Central Bank told the press on Monday, “ [during periods] of global financial crisis and turmoil in the developed economic centres, gold becomes one of the principal safe assets because it is the only means of international payment that has its own intrinsic value — in other words it is not a debt of other countries.” The relationship between Chavez and the US is commonly known to not be a good one. Chavez once famously stated, ‘I hereby accuse the North American empire of being the biggest menace to our planet.’ His moves to repatriate the country’s gold may be seen to be making a point to the American government, which has long coerced the South American continent, but is Chavez also making a savvy move towards self-sufficiency. Gold and democracy Gold is a way of expressing your democratic right – your right to choose- why should these countries operate with the US Dollar as the reserve currency? Growing economic powers such as China are likely to  become the next world leaders, if they’re preparing to abandon a national currency for gold then maybe we’re beginning to see a second phase of the a gold standard. History repeats. Jan Skoyles contributes to The Real Asset Co research desk. Jan has recently graduated with a First in International Business and Economics. In her final year she developed a keen interest in Austrian economics, Libertarianism and particularly precious metals.
The Real Asset Co. is a secure and efficient way to invest precious metals. Clients typically use our platform to build a long position and are using gold and silver bullion as a savings mechanism in the face on currency debasement and devaluations. The Real Asset Co. holds a distinctly Austrian world view and was launched to help savers and investors secure and protect their wealth and purchasing power.


China Financial Markets: When Will China Emerge From the Global Crisis?

I am saddened to report that Michael Pettis' site China Financial Markets has been blocked. The link redirects to a site with a one line message "This Account Has Been Suspended". When I have more details, I will post them.

Note: I just heard back from Pettis who is unsure of what happened. Hopefully this will be cleared up soon. I am leaving the rest of this post as I originally wrote it.

This is really a shame because Pettis is invariably a great read. I am personally indebted because he has taught me most of what I know about trade.

Michael Pettis is Professor of Finance at Peking University, and Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

When Will China Emerge from the Global Crisis?

Via email (this may have been posted on his blog but obviously I cannot tell), please consider snips fromWhen will China emerge from the global crisis? by Michael Pettis.
Caixin, one of my favorite magazines, has an interview with Liu Mingkang, former China Banking Regulation Commission chairman. In it Liu says: I've said in the past, that this economic crisis will spread from the United States to Europe and finally land in Asia. Now we can see that it's already begun influencing Asia.

In 2008 and 2009 I argued that the crisis we were undergoing would affect every major economy in the world, but not necessarily at the same pace. I suggested that the US typically is quick to adjust and, given the pace of deleveraging that was already taking place, I expected that it would be the first major economy out of the crisis, probably in the next two to three years, as private debt levels continue to decline and public debt growth slows.

By now I think the prediction that the US will be among the first and China among the last to escape the crisis no longer seems as eccentric. Others are making similar predictions. There is growing awareness that China has not yet addressed the changes forced upon it by the global crisis, and will have to do so soon. It has certainly become easier to see how the crisis has spread, as Liu points out, first from the US and then to Europe and now to Asia.

It is important to note that it is not just Liu who is thinking along these lines. There were for example two other interesting articles last week in Caixin which I think are useful in understanding China. The first article, by Wang Lan, addresses the problem of State-Owned-Enterprises (SOEs) in China.

In Stifling the Nation's Vitality Wang addresses one consequence of state investment.

The vitality of the Chinese economy is being stifled by SOEs, especially central-level, or top, SOEs, and this is borne out by research. In 2010, the capital of 102 central-level SOEs was equivalent to 61.4 percent of GDP, and their earnings equaled 42.2 percent of GDP. 

The second national economic census taken in 2008 reported profits of nearly 900 billion yuan by finance industry central-level SOEs. Banks accounted for 64 percent of that profit. 

These gargantuan SOEs have not only failed to lead us toward a new stage of development, but they have actually inhibited the vitality of the Chinese economy by distorting resource allocation.

Wang recommends that Beijing begin a privatization process to wean SOEs from their addiction to excessively cheap capital, monopoly power, and distorted governance. This, he says, will force the SOEs to address and resolve their role in wasting capital, stifling innovation, and concentrating wealth. It will also allow China to grow in a much healthier and balanced way.

I have always thought that the least painful way for China to rebalance its economy requires that it radically redistribute income and wealth away from the state sector and to the household sector. There are many ways this can happen, some better and some worse, but privatizing SOEs and using the proceeds to clean up the banks (whose Non-Perfgorming-Loans are a future claim on households), to shore up the social safety net, and to permit SME’s more scope in which to compete is, in my opinion, the most efficient ways to do so. It would also weaken sectors that are able to restrain change in the economy.

Returning to the System

For many years we were told that privatization was pretty much out of the question in China. I disagree, and have argued often that within two or three years the constraints imposed by the current growth model will ensure that policymakers and their advisors in Beijing will be discussing privatization much more actively.

This discussion actually ties into the second Caixin article, by Tsinghua University sociology professor Guo Yuhua China: A Country Where No One is Secure.

Guo starts by referring to a deep malaise in the country:

What is the most common feeling in China today? I think many people would say disappointment. This feeling comes from the insufficient improvement in their lives that people are achieving amid rapid economic growth. It also comes from the contrast between the degree to which individual social status is rising and the idea of the "rise of a great and powerful nation."

Guo asks for a more robust social system in which the benefits of economic growth are not so heavily skewed towards a political elite and in which members of the various strata below the elite have increased opportunities of participating in the economic process:

Power is becoming too formidable and cruel. It is out of control, and without limits. It has kidnapped society and strangled reform. Facing this, finding a solution is a matter of vital importance. In a situation where special interest groups have choked off the possibility of various types of progress, building a just society and enacting reform is difficult. Moreover, there is not a ready-made civil society waiting to settle into the void.

Civil society is produced by the participation of citizens. Extrication from stagnation and the restoration of social vitality can only come from the start of civil consciousness and civil action. Only by empowering society and enlightening citizens can the strength to reform be developed.


This is becoming a pretty contentious debate. Over the past several months, in fact, we have seen a noticeable surge in articles and reports like this one – often by very prominent academics and policy advisors – criticizing the power of special interests in China. Their main concern seems to be over the constraints these special interests impose on further Chinese development, with the entrenched interests that have benefited over the last decade or two having become so powerful that they are making it increasingly difficult for China to adjust.

I apologize for the rather abstract and dry description in this and the three previous paragraphs of what is actually a gripping and very interesting topic, but for perhaps obvious reasons this is something about which I am reluctant to say too much. Still, anyone trying to predict China’s economic outlook for the next few years should be very aware of this fierce debate.Reasons Obvious

Above emphasis in red is mine.

Yes Michael, I am saddened to say the reasons are indeed obvious.

In China, when you overly criticize government you are going to run into problems, such as your entire blog being blocked (or something much, much worse). My blog is blocked in China as well.

While on the subject of blockage, please consider Country Specific Blog Censorship by Google; Twitter Employs Censorship as Well; Echo Comments Not Working on Redirects.

Also, please reconsider paragraphs above in italics by Guo Yuhua, starting with "Power is becoming too formidable and cruel. It is out of control, and without limits. It has kidnapped society and strangled reform. ...Only by empowering society and enlightening citizens can the strength to reform be developed."

Is Guo talking about China or the war-mongers, the unions, the banks, and the corporate lobbyists in the US? My vote is all of the above.

 Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post ListMike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.


Bespoke's Sector Snapshot

bespokeinvest.com - Thu, 2012-02-09 23:07

Every Thursday we publish our Sector Snapshot report over at Bespoke Premium.  (Click here for a sample of the report.) 

Below we highlight our trading range charts for the S&P 500 and its ten sectors, which is one section of the report.  In each chart, the light blue shading represents the sector's "normal" trading range, which is one standard deviation above and below the 50-day moving average.  The red shading represents between one and two standard deviations above the 50-day, and moves into or above the red zone are considered overbought.  The green shading represents between one and two standard deviations below the 50-day, and moves into or below the green zone are considered oversold.

As shown, the S&P 500 has been in overbought territory basically for the last month now, and it's currently close to two standard deviations above its 50-day. 

Eight of the ten S&P 500 sectors are currently overbought, with the Technology sector clearly the most extended.  Financials, Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Materials are all extremely overbought as well, but they're not quite as overbought as Tech.  Utilities and Telecom are the two sectors that aren't overbought at the moment.  These two sectors have lagged severely all year as the "risk-on" trade has driven money out of defensives and into cyclicals.  A pullback by the cyclicals from overbought levels would likely see money flow back into the defensives, however.

Become a Bespoke Premium member today to access our Sector Snapshot on a weekly basis.

“Desperate Shot in the Dark” of Quantitative Easing “Will Boost Inflation & Gold” Say Analysts

TheDailyGold - Thu, 2012-02-09 22:59

Thurs 9 Feb., 08:45 EST

“Desperate Shot in the Dark” of Quantitative Easing “Will Boost Inflation & Gold” Say Analysts

The WHOLESALE MARKET gold price slipped 0.6% to $1730 in London on Thursday morning, regaining most of that dip as the European Central Bank kept its key lending rate on hold and the Bank of England extended its purchases of UK government bonds to £325 billion ($515bn).

When completed, this new Quantitative Easing will see the Bank hold nearly one-third of the UK’s outstanding national debt.

“The growing consensus among central bankers is that their experiment with QE is still working,” wrote Gavyn Davies, now of Fulcrum Asset Management and previously a policy advisor to the UK government, as well as head of global economics at Goldman Sachs until 2001 and chairman of the BBC until 2004, in the Financial Times on Wednesday.

“It was a shot in the dark, and a rather desperate one at that. But up to now it has had the desired effect, which is certainly a far better outcome than the alternative.”

“The Bank of England’s latest round of quantitative easing is likely to increase the risk of higher inflation,” said World Gold Council director Marcus Grubb to Reuters, “and prompt investors to seek assets, such as gold, which can act as a hedge against rising prices.”

The gold price for UK investors today slipped 0.5% to £1093 per ounce as the Pound rallied.

Since the Bank of England began quantitative easing 3 years ago, gold has risen 70% for Sterling investors.

“Continued optimism over Greece is supportive of gold,” said one London dealer this morning, noting the recent link in daily moves between the gold price and the European single currency vs. the Dollar.

“There is agreement on all the issues bar one,” said Greek finance minister Evangelos Venizelos to reporters in Athens today, claiming that only state pensions remain under discussion in budget cuts demanded by Greece’s EU partners and the International Monetary Fund in return for their €130 billion ($172bn) bail-out.

Greek unemployment has risen to 20.9%, the Statistical Authority said today. A large chunk of Greece’s outstanding debt is due for repayment on March 20th.

Holding UK rates today at a record low of 0.5% for the 36th month in succession, the Bank of England announced a shift in its purchases of government debt, targeting more 3-15 year maturities than long-dated gilts.

Twenty and 30-year gilt prices fell on the news, nudging interest rates higher, but shorter-term UK debt rose sharply, knocking the annual yield offered to buyers of 5-year gilts back down towards last month’s record lows beneath 1.0%.

UK inflation over the last 5 years has averaged 3.2% per annum. The Bank’s official target is 2.0% per year.

Back in the gold bullion market, “Everyone is in wait-and-see mode,” Reuters quotes Ronald Leung at Lee Cheong Gold Dealers in Hong Kong.

“We don’t see much scrap [supply] and buying has cooled after prices rebounded. [But] Greece seems to be closer to a concrete deal, which weighs on the Dollar and helps [the gold price].”

Keeping its key lending rate at 1.0% again on Thursday, the ECB will this month repeat its unlimited offer of 3-year loans to Eurozone banks, an offer which drew demand of nearly half-a-trillion Euros in December.

Many analysts expect demand to top €1 trillion on Feb. 29th.

“[Such action] will lead to a lot of interest into gold,” reckons UBS Wealth Management’s head of commodity research, Dominic Schnider.

“Real assets remain something people like to have in their portfolios. $2000 an ounce should be easily achieved. We actually expect prices to go above.”

Adrian Ash
BullionVault

Gold price chart, no delay   |   Buy gold online at live prices

Adrian Ash is head of research at BullionVault, the secure, low-cost gold and silver market for private investors online, where you can buy gold today vaulted in Zurich on $3 spreads and 0.8% dealing fees.

(c) BullionVault 2012

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.


China’s Rebalancing Should Be Good for Gold Demand

TheDailyGold - Thu, 2012-02-09 22:10

Thursday, 9 February 2011

The next stage of China’s development could give gold buyers a boost…

THERE IS an old saying: “Nobody rings a bell at the top or bottom of a market.”

Having said that, anyone reading about the stampede for gold during last month’s Chinese New Year celebrations might have heard a faint ringing in their ears.

Here are a few quotations from various press sources:

  • “Some customers just walk in and buy a bunch of 100g gold bars all at once…Companies come in too to buy gold bars for presents.” – branch manager, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.
  • “Some companies are giving out gold instead of cash to their employees” –Jia Zhihong, jeweler, Wuhan.
  • “With customers crowding and rushing in, we did not even have time to eat and drink.” – gold counter sales clerk.
  • “People seem crazy about gold, snatching it up more like a cheap cabbage than such a precious metal…You have to quickly decide whether to make a purchase, or it will be taken away by others.” – Beijing shopper
  • “Think of it like investing in the stock market…Gold maintains its value much better than stocks.” – sales clerk, China Gold store.

The classic signs of an investment mania are there. Mass participation, frenzied buying, an established narrative that something is a ‘sure thing’. But though this may look like the-mania-before-the-crash, that doesn’t mean it is.

China’s industrial development is still very much a work in progress. The likely next phase is a rebalancing of wealth away from industry and towards households. Given the demonstrable appetite for gold among Chinese consumers, this should be a major supporting factor for global gold demand.

According to World Gold Council data, Chinese gold consumption totaled 207.4 tonnes in 2003. By 2009 it had more than doubled to 457.7 tonnes. More recently, gold imports from Hong Kong, widely regarded as a proxy for total gold imports, tripled in 2011.

China only began deregulating its gold market a decade ago. Until the Shanghai Gold Exchange opened in late 2002, the government held a monopoly on gold ownership. It is possible that the growth in Chinese gold demand could merely represent catch-up, but this seems unlikely given how rapidly China’s economy grew over the same period. Ordinary Chinese have been growing steadily wealthier, meaning more and more people have had the wherewithal to buy gold.

A working paper by economists Guonan Ma and Wang Yi published last year by the Bank for International Settlements, for example, found that household savings as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) rose from 16% in 2001 to 23% by 2008 – a period in which GDP itself regularly grew by 10% or more a year.

The authors also found there was a considerable rise in household’s average propensity to save – that is, the proportion of disposable income that is held as savings. One possible explanation for this could be that economic growth has raised more and more Chinese to just above subsistence level, as agrarian workers urbanize and take higher-paying factory jobs for instance. As incomes grow, an increasing number can for the first time afford to save. Compared to those on higher incomes, though, these new savers must save a greater proportion of their disposable pay in order to attain a given level of savings.

This is not the only factor likely to have driven Chinese savings higher. Ma and Wang also argue that “precautionary savings motives” also explain the rise in personal savings. They cite the period 1995-2005, which saw a 50% fall in employment at state companies:

‘Downsized employees received modest social welfare benefits, while many smaller money-losing state companies were shut down altogether. As a result, the enterprise-based cradle-to-grave social safety net shrank rapidly…The large-scale corporate restructuring and downsizing between 1995 and 2005 increased both income and expenditure uncertainties and weakened the enterprise-based social safety net, thus reinforcing the precautionary motives to save.’

Consider that for a second. Consider how it would have felt from the perspective of a “downsized” Chinese worker. Your socialist government, in power since 1949, has thrown a whole load of people out of work and done very little to help them afterwards.

In this context, it is understandable why people in China started saving more. One only has to think of the long shadow cast by Germany’s hyperinflation in the early 1920s, and the pathological fear Germans to this day have of price instability, to see how economic upheaval can have an enduring impact on financial behavior.

China therefore looks set to have a high savings rate for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, the rapid growth of Chinese gold demand suggests that many of those who can afford it choose to use some of their savings to buy gold (indeed, many have chosen to store some savings as gold).

Of course, this is not to say that the Chinese will continue to buy gold in ever greater quantities indefinitely. Indeed, it is impossible to know how a sharp slowdown in growth would affect Chinese gold demand. There may be some safe haven buying, especially if financial institutions collapse or people fear higher inflation as a result of any central bank response. On the other hand though, slower growth would sap the buying power of would-be gold consumers.

This is not an academic consideration. China faces a number of likely headwinds going forward. Most immediately, its export-led growth model means it is exposed to any deterioration in the global economy, for example the ongoing crisis in Europe, with which China has major trade links. It’s also probable that China has more deep-rooted troubles brewing. Beijing-based economist Michael Pettis argues that China has for years been misallocating capital “on a grand scale”, with state-owned enterprises investing in projects of questionable economic merit.

Elsewhere Pettis draws a parallel with Japan, which he argues underwent a similar phase of overinvestment, making Japan’s subsequent stagnation akin to what China might face (and also qualitatively different from the post-consumption boom crisis the US and Europe currently find themselves in):

‘This is not the problem that that the US or Europe is suffering from.  [The US and Europe] suffer from a typical debt-fueled overconsumption boom, whereas Japan suffered from a typical debt-fueled over-investment boom, and Japan’s period of over-investment was much, much more extreme (centralized investment booms can last much longer and go much further than decentralized consumption booms).  This is why I think the Japanese experience tells us almost nothing about what Europe and the US will go through.

‘On the other hand, it might tell us a lot about what China will go through.  In fact we can make a more general point.  Command economies (Japan, the USSR, Brazil and many others during their “miracle” periods) tend to have much more rapid investment-driven growth during the good times and much more difficult and longer-lasting adjustments.’

So far, so very bearish for China. But Japan’s experience in the years following World War 2 also offers longer term hope. In a working paper published last year,  Bank of Japan economists Tomoyuki Fukumoto and Ichiro Muto argue that the high economic growth rates of today’s China mirror those seen in Japan between 1955 and 1970, which they say were “initiated by vigorous investment”.

After 1970, Japan saw a significant rebalancing of its economy away from investment towards consumption:

Consumption and investment in Japan as percentage of nominal GDP
Fukumoto and Muto find that one key factor behind this rebalancing was the rising share of national income that went to labor, with labor’s share of GDP shooting up ten percentage points between 1970 and 1975.
Pettis argues that ongoing rebalancing towards consumption also explains why Japanese living standards have continued to rise over the last two decades despite the stagnant Japanese economy:

‘It was the state sector that bore most of the brunt of the slower growth, and this shows up as the explosion in government debt.  Households were fine because although the GDP pie was growing at a much slower rate after 1990 than before, their share of the pie was growing after 1990, whereas it shrank before 1990…I think the same might happen, or at least could happen, in China.’

China’s rebalancing has barely begun; consumption as a share of GDP has continued to fall in recent years much as it has for the last three decades:

Consumption and investment in China as percentage of nominal GDP
At the start of last year, the Economist Intelligence Unit rated the results of China’s 11th Five-Year Plan, which ran from 2006 to 2010. One of the categories was ‘Economic rebalancing’, a term which includes China’s external as well as internal imbalances. China scored poorly in this category, being graded a ‘D’ for its efforts to address ‘external imbalances’, another ‘D’ for ‘excessive investment’ (see chart above) and a ‘C’ for ‘innovation- and services-based growth’.

There are, however, signs that an internal rebalancing may be starting to get underway. The EIU scored China a B- on ‘boosting farm incomes’, a B+ on ‘social security expansion’ and an ‘A’ on ‘reducing regional disparities’, commenting that “economic growth has gradually shifted inland”.

This may go some way towards explaining the rise in household savings as a percentage of GDP noted earlier, and in particular the rise in the average propensity to save as prosperity spreads and raises more people above subsistence. (As an aside, it is worth pointing out that expansion of social security provision could in time actually lead to a fall in savings rates if it sufficiently weakens the precautionary motive for saving – i.e. to provide for contingencies such as sickness and unemployment in the absence of a social safety net).

There are other signs of nascent change. Recent disputes at Apple and Microsoft supplier Foxconn are the latest in a series of industrial incidents to hit China recently. Fukumoto and Muto find that China has seen a sharp rise in the number of industrial disputes since the global financial crisis began:

Number of labor disputes in China
Industrial action can and does yield results. As CNN reports, Foxconn twice gave its Shenzhen workers pay rises in 2010 following a spate of suicides at the plant.

That this rise in industrial action has occurred in the wake of the financial crisis is unlikely to be mere coincidence. But the example of Japan – which saw a rise in industrial disputes from the mid-1960s, and a sharp spike following the oil price shock of the early 1970s – suggests that concessions, once given, are difficult to reverse, as Fukumoto and Muto note:

‘…after the mid-1960s, workers’ sense of entitlement to their “fair share” rose…and their bargaining power strengthened. Consequently, it became difficult to restrain the rise in real wages again after the end of the oil crisis, and the rise in the labor share [of national income] became permanent.’

Indeed, China’s government announced this week that the minimum wage should grow by an average of 13% a year between now and 2015. It remains to be seen how this plays out in practice, but it suggests the authorities are aware of a need to raise household incomes.

China is yet to undergo significant internal rebalancing of real incomes away from industry and towards people, such as that experienced by Japan in the postwar era. There is good reason to assume that, sooner or later, such a rebalancing will occur.

And it is people, not industry, who buy gold. So unless China’s development gets completely stuck, its gold consumption should continue to rise over the long run.

Ben Traynor
BullionVault

Gold value calculator   |   Buy gold online at live prices

Editor of Gold News, the analysis and investment research site from world-leading gold ownership service BullionVault, Ben Traynor was formerly editor of the Fleet Street Letter, the UK’s longest-running investment letter. A Cambridge economics graduate, he is a professional writer and editor with a specialist interest in monetary economics.

(c) BullionVault 2011

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.


Technology Sector on 10-Day Winning Streak

bespokeinvest.com - Thu, 2012-02-09 19:10

The S&P 500 Technology sector has had an amazing run since the start of the year.  As shown in our trading range chart below, the sector has nearly gone parabolic in recent days and has moved well above overbought territory.

The run has been so strong for the Tech sector that it has been up for 10 consecutive trading days and 17 out of the last 18.  Below are the five other 10-day winning streaks that the sector has had since 1990.  We also provide how the sector performed on day 11, over the next week and over the next month following these five streaks.  As shown, the sector has declined on day 11 three out of five times, but it has been up over the following week all five times for an average gain of 1.62%.  Over the next two weeks, the sector has been higher three out of five times for an average gain of 0.88%. 

Subscribe to Bespoke Premium and gain access to the top earnings season analysis around.


Sign Up Below to My Free Weekly Newsletter

Hello. My name is Mike Swanson. I’m the best-selling author of the book Strategic Stock Trading. In a former life I used to run a hedge fund from 2003 to 2006 that generated a return of over 78% during that time frame. In fact it was ranked in the top 35 out of 5,000 hedge funds in 2005.

After I retired from the hedge fund world I setup this website and blog. If you sign up for my free weekly email list below I’ll send you an update on average about once a week on my views of the current stock market trends and share with you actionable investment ideas.

Now I cannot promise you that every stock I find will go up in value. I can’t promise you endless 100% returns as others claim they do and as all the disclaimers say past performance does not necessarily predict future performance and you can lose all of your money in the stock market.

This is reality.

What I can promise you is my dedication to doing the best I can for you.

You see the key to making money over the long-run in the stock market is to manage your risk. Once you sign up to my newsletter I’ll send you a series of educational videos and writings showing you how I use stop-loss orders to cut any potential losses and how I use my two fold formula system that combines fundamental and technical analysis to pick stocks. My goal is to risk one dollar to try to make at least three dollars in my trades by looking for stocks that are priced cheaply on a valuation basis, have high earnings growth, and have excellent chart patterns.

So join my list below and let me help guide you on your journey in the stock market.