Will President Trump Make A Wise Decision or a Dangerous One?

Trump almost took the country to the abyss, but instead he stopped and made the smarter choice. Instead of giving Bannon a rubber stamp on the national security council he gave the national security state a man they trust and respect.

General known for sharp questions will be Trump's new top security adviser - Reuters

Feed aggregator

Trump’s Militarism and Isolationism

Future of Freedom Foundation - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 09:08

I cannot recommend too highly an op-ed that appeared in yesterday’s Washington Post, entitled, “Quit Calling Donald Trump an Isolationist. He’s Worse than That” by Stephen Wertheim, a Fellow in History at King’s College at the University of Cambridge. It is an absolutely excellent analysis of Trump, foreign policy, militarism, and isolationism.

Those who support U.S. interventionism around the world have accused Trump of wanting to return to the era of “isolationism.” Referring to the period after World War I, the term is used to describe the belief among most Americans to stay out of another European war.

Why did Americans favor staying out of what became World War II? Because they were totally disgusted with the results of U.S. intervention in World War I. Remember: The goal of interventionists in that war was to bring an end, once and for all, to Europe’s endless wars and to “make the world safe for demoracy.”

The exact opposite happened. Within 20 years, Europe’s endless wars were about to erupt again, especially with the rise of Nazi Germany.

Americans could see that U.S. interventionism into World War II had brought nothing but senseless death, destruction, and loss of liberty to the American people. That’s why they were adamantly opposed to entering World War II.

It was an enormous movement, consisting of the overwhelming majority of the American people. Interventionists today love to smear the movement by saying that it consisted of anti-Semites. Perhaps they are referring to President John F. Kennedy and President Gerald Ford, both of whom were part of the anti-interventionist movement. The reality is that while the movement included a few people who sympathized with Nazism or fascism, the overwhelming number of anti-interventionists were people with regular beliefs who just opposed U.S. entry into another European war.

There is another factor to consider here: The anti-interventionists were not isolationists. They favored interaction among the American people and the rest of the world, primarily through trade. In other words, they wanted to constrain the U.S. government by prohibiting its entry into another world war while, at the same time, unleash the American private sector to trade with everyone in the world.

Ironically, that’s what interventionists have long called “isolationism.” They hold that as long as a nation’s government is constrained from participating in overseas conflicts and wars, that nation is “isolationist” even if the private sector is freely interacting with the rest of the world.

The anti-interventionists prior to World War II were actually reflecting the anti-interventionist mindset that guided the founding of the United States. The famous speech to Congress by John Quincy Adams on July 4, 1821, entitled “In Search of Monsters to Destroy,” set forth the founding principles of America when it came to foreign policy.

Adams pointed out that there were lots of monsters around the world that caused untold suffering for people. Tyrants, dictatorships, famines, wars, conflicts, and disease. The United States, Adams said, would not send its military forces abroad to save people from these monsters. Instead, the American people would focus on creating a free, prosperous, and harmonious society here at home for the world to emulate.

In the process, the nation’s founding principles would also include free trade and open immigration, thereby unleashing the ability of the American people to interact with the people of the world. That’s why there were no immigration controls for the first 100 years of American history. Americans were sending a message to people everywhere, which said, “We won’t send our military forces to save you from those monsters but if you are able to escape, know that there will always be at least one nation that won’t force you to return to those monsters if you are able to get here.

Notice that Trump’s mindset is completely different from that of American anti-interventionists. He wants to build walls around American consisting of higher tariffs and immigration controls. In other words, he wants to isolate the American private sector from the rest of the world. His isolationism contradicts the free-trade, open-immigration philosophy that guided the founding of our country.

But it’s worse than that because Trump is also an ardent militarist. He wants to unleash the U.S. military and the CIA to continue their post-World War II policy of perpetual interventionism all over the world. At the same time, Trump wants Americans to glorify the military establishment. He’s even planning on holding grandiose military parades in cities all across America, where Americans can ogle and praise all the military armaments their tax monies are purchasing.

Once again, Trump’s mindset runs contrary to the fervent anti-militarist spirit that guided the founding of the United States. The American people who were living at the time the Constitution called the federal government into existence hated military establishments, which they believed constituted a grave threat to their economic well-being and their liberty. Just take a look at what some of the Founding Fathers said about standing armies: https://www.fff.org/2013/03/04/gun-control-and-the-dangers-of-a-standing-army.

Throughout U.S. history there has been an enormous battle taking place between interventionists and non-interventionists. For the first hundred years, the anti-interventionists held sway. The turn toward interventionism and, for that matter, empire, started in 1898 with the Spanish American War. For an excellent account of that major turning point, I recommend the excellent new book by Stephen Kinzer, whose articles we often link to in our FFF Daily—The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire.

The Spanish American War was followed by the disastrous intervention into World War I, where tens of thousands of American men died for nothing.

Once President Franklin Roosevelt succeeding in getting Japan to attack the United States, the anti-interventionist movement was finished. Then, after World War II the interventionists embroiled the United States in a “cold war” against their World War II partner and ally, the Soviet Union. In the process, they converted the federal government from a constitutionally limited-government republic to a national security state, without even the semblance of a constitutional amendment.

Then came endless interventionism all over the world, through invasions, occupations, coups, assassinations, support of dictatorships, bribery, kidnapping, and much more. Wars in Korea and Vietnam. Regime change operations in Iran, Guatemala, Congo, Venezuela, Chile, and elsewhere.

When the Cold War suddenly and unexpectedly ended in 1989, it all morphed into an endless “war on terrorism” (and on Islam, Muslims, and Sharia law), including wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan, which are proving to be endless in nature. As a consequence, the economic well-being of the American people remains under growing threat from an ever-increasing federal debt, and the liberty of the American people remains under growing threat from an ever-more-powerful national security establishment.

But the battle between the interventionists and non-interventionists continues. See this article about how Americans today are rediscovering and embracing our nation’s anti-interventionist heritage.

The post Trump’s Militarism and Isolationism appeared first on The Future of Freedom Foundation.

London bomb plot prosecutor named as UK terror legislation watchdog

MiddleEasteye - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 09:00
Language Undefined

Max Hill, who prosecuted 21/7 plotters, to succeed David Anderson who had used post to highlight concerns about government's Prevent strategy

Libya PM's convoy comes under fire in assassination attempt

MiddleEasteye - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 08:44
Language Undefined

Fayez al-Sarraj's fragile GNA has struggled to impose its authority, particularly in eastern Libya where a rival administration holds sway

Turkish protesters demand death for alleged Erdogan 'assassins'

MiddleEasteye - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 08:34
Language Undefined

Hundreds call for 44 soldiers to receive death penalty as they face court accused of attempting to kill president

IS lashes out at Egypt with threats to Copts, MB, Sunnis and Salafis

MiddleEasteye - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:58
Language Undefined

IS video threatens to increase its attacks on Christians and labels Muslim Brotherhood, Salafists, and Azharis as 'apostates'

Trump a Lot Like LBJ - Whom Liberals Still Idolize

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:55
John Fund, National Review
Austin, Texas – As president, he cut a grandiose figure. He was a braggart and a frequent liar. He was suspicious of other countries, frequently saying, Foreigners are not like the folks I am used to. He had a reckless disregard for limits. He belittled and browbeat others to intimidate them and give him what he wanted. Historian Robert Dallek said that he viewed criticism of his policies as personal attacks and opponents of his policies as disloyal to him and the country.He would bully and insult reporters, saying of one that he always knew when he was around, because he could smell...

President Trump More Cruel & Destructive Than We Feared

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:53
Michelle Goldberg, Slate
Right after Donald Trump was elected president, I interviewed Masha Gessen, the Russian dissident writer, for an essay I was thinking of calling

Why Dems Need to Forget About 'Reaching Out'

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:50
Paul Waldman, The American Prospect
The time for that will comeâ??but it's not now.

Ranking Obama on President's Day

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:47
Paul Kengor, The American Spectator

News Roundup 2/20/17

LibertarianInstitute - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:43
  • Scott Pruitt has been confirmed to head the EPA. Pruitt is currently suing the EPA as Oklahoma’s Attorney General. [Link]
  • An Arizona sheriff overturns a rule put in place by his predecessor, Joe Arpaio, that allows immigrants to be detained for over the maximum 48-hours. [Link]
  • Senator Graham says 2017 will be “a year of kicking Russia in the ass.” Graham is supporting several anti-Russia pieces legislation. [Link]
  • 1,000 US troops in Poland will be positioned only 85 miles from the Russian border. [Link]
  • The Senate is looking to pass new sanctions against Iran for testing a medium-range ballistic missile. The sanctions have bipartisan support. [Link]
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is pulling back on some settlement expansion after meeting with Trump. [Link]
  • The Iraqi government dropped leaflets over Western Mosul letting civilians know that the offensive against ISIS is about to begin. It’s estimated that there are about 650,000 civilians in Western Mosul. [Link]
  • The US has increased the number of sorties it’s flying over Mosul each day to 30-50. The US has already bombed all the bridges that connect East and West Mosul, making it nearly impossible for civilians to flee Western Mosul. [Link]
  • Three Iraqi children were killed when one child accidently stepped on a roadside bomb left there by ISIS. [Link]
  • This article looks into Trump’s policy in Yemen so far. The article also suggests that Trump will soon approve a sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia. [Link]

The post News Roundup 2/20/17 appeared first on The Libertarian Institute.

News Roundup 2/20/17 was first posted on February 20, 2017 at 6:43 am.

Why Are Lefties So Ignorant About Civics?

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:22
Karol Markowicz, New York Post
Last week, cable news personality Sally Kohn tweeted what she called a straightforward plan that would eject Donald Trump and install Hillary Clinton into the presidency: 1. Impeach Trump Pence;â?¦

Is 'Deep State' Out To Get Trump? Not Yet

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:21
Doyle McManus, Los Angeles Times
The scariest new catchphrase of the Trump era â?? and we're only one month in â?? is the deep state, a term borrowed from countries like Turkey and Egypt, where networks of military officers and intelligence operatives control much of the government.

The Deep State Targets Trump

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:21
Pat Buchanan, The American Conservative
When Gen. Michael Flynn was forced to resign as national security adviser, Bill Kristol purred his satisfaction, "If it comes to it, prefer the deep state to the Trump state." To Kristol, the permanent regime, not the elected president and his government, is the real defender and rightful repository of our liberties. Yet it was this regime, the deep state, that carried out what Eli Lake of Bloomberg calls "The Political Assassination of Michael Flynn."

Why Presidents Day is the Worst American Holiday

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:20
Bonnie Kristian, The Week
Don't exalt the American presidency. Neuter it.

Trump Will Keep Moving His Agenda Forward

RealClearPolitics - Mon, 02/20/2017 - 07:20
James Robbins, USA Today
People will still be shocked that the new president doesn't govern based on polls.